Friday, October 21, 2016
Analysis for "On the Want of Money" 10.21.2016
In class, we read an excerpt from "On the Want of Money," an essay written by William Hazlitt in the nineteenth century. The author's position on money is that it is the root of all evil and misfortune. This can be related to in the real world because in reality, people tend to have arguments and separate due to money. I can also relate the author's position because in my own life, I am unable to get what I want because of the cost of the item. We have all most likely stopped to think about money before making a decision. The author supports his position that money steals away happiness through the use of rhetorical techniques, such as word choice and imagery. An example of word choice is the use of the word "falsehood" (31). By using this word, the author conveys his message that money leads to distrust of others since the word "falsehood" has a negative connotation of being untrue. Therefore, if one were "to be assailed on every side with...falsehood" (30-31), it means that the person with money is surrounded by people who put on a face just to deceive him/her. Another example of word choice is the use of the words "constant distress" (29). By using the word "constant," the author emphasizes the continuous stress caused by money, which shows that money only brings problems to a person. In addition to word choice, the author also uses imagery, which is shown when the author states "stand behind a counter, or to sit at a desk in some public office, or to marry your landlady" (16-18). This quote shows imagery because it creates an image of what would happen if one were to be rich. The image that appears from this description is an awful job that involves boring work. Using this imagery emphasizes that to earn money, one must sacrifice his or her happiness. By using imagery and word choice, the author effectively supports his position that money leads to misfortune.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I definitely agree with you that the speaker chose a specific words that connoted a negative feeling to it such "falsehood". I would like to add onto those specific word choices, including the words "envy" and "back-biting". Those two words have the same negative connotation as "falsehood". In addition to your explanation of the word causing people to put a deceitful face, it shows how money brings out the worst in people. The darkest sides are usually brought out by greed and desires and those words did a great job of describing the negative effects of money. Also, as you have mentioned about "constant distress", I also believe this part appeals to pathos. Stated on lines 28-30, "...if you succeed, after the exertions of years, and undergoing constant distress of mind of fortune." Constant distress implies this never-ending unhappiness which causes the audiences to fear the possible consequence it might have on them if they had this strong desired for money. Money is meant for the purpose of enjoyment but it defeats the whole purpose of it if one will never get to enjoy it because their lives will be consumed with endless work. Therefore, Hazlitt's essay was effective in convincing that money is not always the solution to one's problem but can actually be more harmful than beneficial. I understand your connection to the author's arguments mentioned above but do you think that if you were able to get what you wanted with money that you would have been satisfied or would the whole problem with money still persist?
ReplyDelete